Sunday, 21 September 2014

On Constitutional Reform, Gerrymandering and Political Expediency

Prime Minister David Cameron's hurried announcement of UK wide constitutional reform in the wake of the Scottish Referendum result risks breaking his pledge to the Scottish people and leaving England with an ill thought through settlement driven by narrow party political considerations.

His coupling of more powers for Scotland (which the three big Westminster parties promised in the independence referendum campaign) with constitutional reform in the whole of the UK brings together two issues, one of which has been thoroughly worked through and one of which hasn't. Scotland has had two years of intense debate and campaigning on these issues, England only started thinking about it on Friday morning when the Scottish result came through. Getting the promised Scottish reforms through Parliament was always going to be challenging with the promised timetable of proposals in a couple of months and draft legislation by January, especially as we have a General Election next year.

Cameron's solution to the 'West Lothian Question" involves stopping Scottish MPs voting on English matters. Now, at first glance this seems fair enough, why should they vote on matters affecting only voters who did not elect them? However such a solution would, entirely uncoincidentally, remove a whole swathe of Labour MPs and give the Conservative Party a pretty unassailable (and given past voting patterns, a seemingly also permanent) majority in any English Parliament. And presumably if Wales and Northern Ireland also win new powers (as seems likely) their MPs would be barred too, further strengthening the Conservative position. Indeed any future Labour government for the UK as a whole would need a pretty hefty majority of about 100 to stand any chance of getting legislation through an 'English only' Parliament.

Trying to ram this through from a standing start in double quick time without a proper breathing space for debate and consideration in the wider country is not good for democracy. By linking the issue of more Scottish powers with wider constitutional change, which David Cameron did within an hour of the referendum result coming through, he risks the promises to the Scottish electorate being broken, which will reawaken the whole independence question again. Boris Johnson more or less confirmed this on the BBC News channel on Friday afternoon when he said that if the English reforms did not go through, he could not see how the Scottish ones could either. One of the main gripes of the Scottish 'Yes' campaign was with the remote and arrogant Westminster elite who break promises.

If the Prime Minister does get it through this has gerrymandered us all. The Labour Party may not be strong enough to stop this. They want to devolve more power to the English cities and regions rather than to England as a whole, but may not see that this might also be a good time to push for proportional representation. While the Scots seem to have got the best of both worlds (effective autonomy while still remaining within the UK), in contrast those parts of England north of the Home Counties or left of Nigel Farage (who seems to be effectively driving Conservative policy at the moment from within UKIP Towers) look screwed. 


The country deserves better than this. Sort out Scotland as promised and don't rush through proposals for the rest of the country based merely on expediency.